Journal: International Journal of Biological Sciences

Article Title: Apoptotic Cancer Cell-Primed Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Suppress Immunosuppressive Macrophages via WISP-1-Integrin α5β3-STAT1 Signaling in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.7150/ijbs.124282

Figure Lengend Snippet: CM from CAFs exposed to apoptotic cancer cells reduces M2 macrophage survival, induces apoptosis, and promotes reprogramming toward an M1 phenotype in vitro . ( a, b ) Cell viability assay of M1 (M1) or M2 macrophages (M2) derived from THP-1 cells and BMDMs. ( c, d ) Apoptotic M1 or M2 macrophages were quantified as the sum of the percentages of early and late stages of apoptosis. Flow cytometry analysis after Annexin V-FICT/PI dual staining was employed to evaluate apoptosis. ( e ) Immunoblot analysis of Bax, Mcl-1, Bcl-xL, cleaved caspase-3, cleaved PARP, and β-actin in THP-1-derived M2 macrophages. ( a-e ) CAFs were exposed to apoptotic 344SQ cells (ApoSQ) or necrotic cancer cells (NecSQ) for 20 h. Conditioned medium from CAFs only (CAF CM), exposed to ApoSQ (ApoSQ-CAF CM) or NecSQ (NecSQ-CAF CM) was treated to THP-1- or BMDM-derived M1 and M2 macrophages for the indicated days ( a , b ), or 3 days ( c-e ). ( f ) Heatmap showing differentially expressed macrophage polarization-related genes in THP-1-derived M2 macrophages treated with CM for 3 days ( left ). Red: high expression; blue: low expression. Relative expression of selected genes from PCR array profiling of macrophage polarization markers ( right ). Log2 fold-change values (ApoSQ-CAF CM vs. CAF CM). ( g ) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA levels of M1 ( Nos2 , MhcII , and Il12p40 ) and M2 ( Tgfβ1 , Il10 , and Il4 ) markers in THP-1-derived M2 macrophages treated with CM for 3 days. ( h ) ELISA of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-13 in the culture supernatant of M2 macrophages treated with CM for 3 days. ( i ) Flow cytometry analysis of the population of CD80 + and CD206 + cells among M2 macrophages derived from THP-1 cells for 2 or 3 days. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values ( right ). NS, not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, two-tailed Student's t -test. Data are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments with similar results ( c , f and i left ; e ) or from three independent experiments (mean ± standard error: a , b , d , g , h ; c , f and i right ).

Article Snippet: To establish M1 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml of IFN-γ (R&D Systems) and 100 ng/ml of lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich) for an additional 48 h. To establish M2 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml IL-4 and 20 ng/ml IL-13 (R&D Systems) for an additional 48 h. Following polarization, cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis or fixed for immunofluorescent staining.

Techniques: In Vitro, Viability Assay, Derivative Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fluorescence, Two Tailed Test

Journal: International Journal of Biological Sciences

Article Title: Apoptotic Cancer Cell-Primed Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Suppress Immunosuppressive Macrophages via WISP-1-Integrin α5β3-STAT1 Signaling in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.7150/ijbs.124282

Figure Lengend Snippet: ApoSQ-CAF CM activates STAT1 in M2 macrophages. ( a, b ) Immunoblot analysis of the indicated proteins in THP-1-derived M1 (M1) and M2 macrophages (M2) treated with CAF CM or ApoSQ-CAF CM for the indicated time. ( c ) Immunofluorescence staining for phosphorylated STAT1 and p21 ( Left ) and quantitation ( Right ) in M2 macrophages for 1 h after treatment with CAF CM or ApoSQ-CAF CM. The imaging medium was VECTASHIELD fluorescence mounting medium containing DAPI. Original magnification: ×400. Scale bars = 20 μm. ( d ) Immunoblot analysis of STAT1 in M2 macrophages transfected with control or STAT1 siRNA ( upper ). Densitometric analysis of the relative STAT1 abundance ( lower ). ( e ) Cell viability assay of M2 macrophages. ( f ) Left: Flow cytometry analysis after Annexin V-FICT/PI dual staining was employed to evaluate the cell apoptosis of M2 macrophages. Right : Apoptotic cells were quantified as the sum of the percentages of early and late stages of apoptosis. ( g ) Immunoblot analysis of the indicated proteins in M2 macrophage lysates. ( h ) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA levels of M1 ( Nos2 , MhcII , and Il12p40 ) and M2 ( Tgfβ1 , Il10 , and Il4 ) markers in M2 macrophages (M2). ( i ) ELISA of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-13 in the culture supernatant of M2 macrophages. ( j ) Flow cytometry analysis of the population of CD80 + and CD206 + cells among M2 macrophages. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values ( right ). ( e - j ) THP-1-derived M2 macrophages were transfected with control or STAT1 siRNA for 24 h before treatment with CM for 2 or 3 days. NS: not significant; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, two-tailed Student's t -test. The data are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments with similar results ( a , b, g ; c , f , and j left ; d upper ) or from three independent experiments (mean ± standard error in c , f , and j right ; d lower ; e , h , i ).

Article Snippet: To establish M1 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml of IFN-γ (R&D Systems) and 100 ng/ml of lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich) for an additional 48 h. To establish M2 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml IL-4 and 20 ng/ml IL-13 (R&D Systems) for an additional 48 h. Following polarization, cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis or fixed for immunofluorescent staining.

Techniques: Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Quantitation Assay, Imaging, Fluorescence, Transfection, Control, Viability Assay, Flow Cytometry, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Two Tailed Test

Journal: International Journal of Biological Sciences

Article Title: Apoptotic Cancer Cell-Primed Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Suppress Immunosuppressive Macrophages via WISP-1-Integrin α5β3-STAT1 Signaling in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.7150/ijbs.124282

Figure Lengend Snippet: Recombinant WISP-1 reduces M2 macrophage survival, induces apoptosis, and promotes reprogramming toward an M1-like phenotype. ( a ) Cell viability assay of THP-1-derived M1 (M1) and M2 macrophages (M2) treated with 20-100 ng/ml mouse (rWISP-1) or human WISP-1 ( h rWISP-1) for 3 days. ( b ) Left: Flow cytometry analysis after Annexin V-FICT/PI dual staining was employed to evaluate the apoptosis of THP-1- derived M1 and M2 macrophages after treatment with h rWISP- (20-100 ng/ml) for 3 days. Right : Apoptotic cells were quantified as the sum of the percentages of early and late stages of apoptosis. ( c ) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA levels of M1 ( Nos2 , MhcII , and Il12p40 ) and M2 ( Tgfβ1 , Il10 , and Il4 ) markers in M2 macrophages treated with 20-100 ng/ml h rWISP-1 for 3 days. ( d ) ELISA of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-13 in the culture supernatant of M2 macrophages treated with 20-100 ng/ml h rWISP-1 for 3 days. ( e ) Flow cytometry analysis of the population of CD80 + and CD206 + cells among M2 macrophages after treatment with h rWISP-1 (20-100 ng/ml) for 2 or 3 days. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values ( right ). ( f ) Heatmap showing differentially expressed macrophage polarization-related genes in THP-1-derived M2 macrophages ( left ). Red: high expression; blue: low expression. Relative expression of selected genes from PCR array profiling of macrophage polarization markers ( right ). Log2 fold-change values ( h rWISP-1 vs. Vehicle). THP-1-derived M2 macrophages were treated with h rWISP-1 (50 ng/ml) for 3 days. NS: not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, two-tailed Student's t -test. The data are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments with similar results ( b , e , and f left ) or from three independent experiments (mean ± standard error: a , c , d ; b , e and f right ).

Article Snippet: To establish M1 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml of IFN-γ (R&D Systems) and 100 ng/ml of lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich) for an additional 48 h. To establish M2 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml IL-4 and 20 ng/ml IL-13 (R&D Systems) for an additional 48 h. Following polarization, cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis or fixed for immunofluorescent staining.

Techniques: Recombinant, Viability Assay, Derivative Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fluorescence, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

Journal: International Journal of Biological Sciences

Article Title: Apoptotic Cancer Cell-Primed Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Suppress Immunosuppressive Macrophages via WISP-1-Integrin α5β3-STAT1 Signaling in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.7150/ijbs.124282

Figure Lengend Snippet: rWISP-1 acts through integrin α5β3 to activate STAT1 in M2 macrophages. ( a , i ) Cell viability assay of M2 macrophages treated with 50 ng/ml human rWISP-1 ( h rWISP-1) for 3 days. ( b , j ) Apoptotic cells were quantified as the sum of the percentages of early and late stages of apoptosis. Flow cytometry analysis after Annexin V-FICT/PI dual staining was employed to evaluate the cell apoptosis of M2 macrophages treated with h rWISP-1 for 3 days. ( c , l ) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA levels of M1 ( Nos2 , MhcII , and Il12p40 ) and M2 ( Tgfβ1 , Il10 , and Il4 ) markers in M2 macrophages treated with h rWISP-1 for 3 days. ( d , m ) ELISA of the cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-13) in the culture supernatants of M2 macrophages treated with h rWISP-1 for 3 days. ( e , n ) Flow cytometry analysis of the population of CD80 + and CD206 + cells among M2 macrophages treated with h rWISP-1 for 2 or 3 days. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values ( right ). ( f ) CoIP assays of protein interaction in M2 macrophages. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-WISP-1 and then immunoblotted with anti-integrin α5 and anti-integrin β3 antibodies. ( g , h ) Immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated and total STAT1 in THP-1-derived M2 macrophages treated with ApoSQ-CAF CM or h rWISP-1 for the indicated time ( g ) or 30 min ( h ). ( k ) Immunoblot analysis of the indicated proteins in M2 macrophages treated with h rWISP-1 for 3 days. ( a-e ) THP-1-derived M2 macrophages were pretreated with an anti-integrin blocking antibody (3 μg/ml; anti-integrin αν, α5, β3 or β5) or corresponding IgG isotype control for 30 min before treatment with rWISP-1 (50 ng/ml). ( i-n ) THP-1-derived M2 macrophages were transfected with control or STAT1 siRNA before treatment with h rWISP-1 (50 ng/ml). NS: not significant; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, two-tailed Student's t -test. The data are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments with similar results ( e , j , and n left ; f , g , h , k ) or from three independent experiments (mean ± standard error: a-d , i , l , m ; e , j , and n right ).

Article Snippet: To establish M1 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml of IFN-γ (R&D Systems) and 100 ng/ml of lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich) for an additional 48 h. To establish M2 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml IL-4 and 20 ng/ml IL-13 (R&D Systems) for an additional 48 h. Following polarization, cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis or fixed for immunofluorescent staining.

Techniques: Viability Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fluorescence, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Blocking Assay, Control, Transfection, Two Tailed Test

Journal: International Journal of Biological Sciences

Article Title: Apoptotic Cancer Cell-Primed Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Suppress Immunosuppressive Macrophages via WISP-1-Integrin α5β3-STAT1 Signaling in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.7150/ijbs.124282

Figure Lengend Snippet: ApoSQ-CAF CM promotes M2-to-M1 TAM reprogramming and activates STAT1 in M2 TAMs via WISP-1. The experimental design was described in Fig. a. ( a ) Heatmap showing differentially expressed genes encoding M1 and M2 marker-related molecules in isolated CD11b + TAMs from primary tumors (left). Red: high expression; blue: low expression. Relative expression of selected genes from PCR array profiling of macrophage polarization markers (right). Log2 fold-change values (ApoSQ-CAF CM vs. CAF CM). ( b ) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA levels of M2 markers ( Arg1 , Cd206 , Cd163 , Il4 , Il10 , Tgfβ1 ), and M1 markers ( Tnfα , Cd80 , MhcII , Nos2 , Ifng , and Il12p40 ) in isolated CD11b + TAMs from primary tumors. NS: not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, Analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test. ( c ) Immunoblot analysis of Arg1, CD206, iNOS, and CD16/32 in isolated CD11b + TAMs from primary tumors. ( d , e ) Flow cytometry analysis of the population of M1 TAMs (MHCII + and CD80 + ) and M2 TAMs (CD163 + and CD206 + ) in CD11b + TAMs from primary tumors. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values ( right ). ( f ) Upper: Representative flow cytometry plots in CD11b + TAMs. Lower : TAM ratio (CD163 + /MHCII + TAMs). ( g-k ) Flow cytometry analysis of the population of M2 macrophages ( g ), Tregs ( h ), M1 macrophages ( i ), CD8 + T cells ( j ), and CD4 + T cells ( k ). Tumor-infiltrating immune cells were stained with antibodies against CD45, CD11b, CD3, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, MHCII, and Ly6C. Absolute number of each cell type was counted using flow cytometry. ( a , d-k ) NS, not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, two-tailed Student's t -test. ( a - k ) The data are from three replicates per condition, with cells pooled from three mice per replicate. ( l, n ) Representative confocal images of primary tumor sections stained with an anti-phosphorylated STAT1 (red), anti-CD206 antibody (green), anti-iNOS antibody (green), and DAPI (blue). Original magnification: ×40. Scale bars = 100 μm. ( m , o ) Quantification of phosphorylated STAT1 + cells among CD206 + cells and iNOS + cells. NS, not significant; *** P < 0.001, Analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test. The data are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments with similar results ( a , d and e left ; c , l , n ; f upper ) or from three independent experiments (mean ± standard error: a , d and e right ; b, g-k , m , o ; f lower ).

Article Snippet: To establish M1 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml of IFN-γ (R&D Systems) and 100 ng/ml of lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich) for an additional 48 h. To establish M2 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml IL-4 and 20 ng/ml IL-13 (R&D Systems) for an additional 48 h. Following polarization, cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis or fixed for immunofluorescent staining.

Techniques: Marker, Isolation, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Staining, Two Tailed Test

Journal: International Journal of Biological Sciences

Article Title: Apoptotic Cancer Cell-Primed Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Suppress Immunosuppressive Macrophages via WISP-1-Integrin α5β3-STAT1 Signaling in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.7150/ijbs.124282

Figure Lengend Snippet: Administration of rWISP-1 reduces TAM density, decrease the M2 fraction and marker expression, and activates STAT1 in M2 TAMs. The experimental design was described in Supplementary a. Where indicated, rWISP-1 (12.5 and 25 μg/kg) was administered intratumorally three times a week for 6 weeks starting 2 days after subcutaneous implantation of 344SQ cells into syngeneic (129/Sν) mice (n = 6 mice per group). Mice were necropsied 6 weeks later. ( a , b ) Upper : Immunofluorescent staining of primary tumor sections showing M2 TAM Markers Arg1 (green) and CD206 (green), along with the pan-macrophage marker CD11b (red). Original magnification: ×40. Scale bars = 100 μm. Lower : Quantitation of Arg1 + and CD206 + TAM (M2) density ( left ) and the fraction of M2 TAMs ( right ) in primary tumors. The fraction of M2 TAMs were determined by the percentage of M2 TAMs within CD11b + TAMs. ( c ) qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA levels of M2 markers ( Arg1 , CD206 , CD163 , IL-4 , IL-10 , TGF-β1 ), and M1 markers ( TNFα , CD80 , MhcII , NOS2, Ifng, and IL-12 p40 ) in isolated CD11b + TAMs from primary tumors. ( d ) Immunoblot analysis of Arg1, CD206, iNOS, and CD16/32 in isolated CD11b + TAMs from primary tumors. ( e, g ) Representative confocal images of primary tumor sections stained with an anti-phosphorylated STAT1 (red), anti-CD206 antibody (green), anti-CD86 antibody (green), and DAPI (blue). Original magnification: ×40. Scale bars = 100 μm. ( f , h ) Quantification of phosphorylated STAT1 + cells among CD206 + cells and CD86 + cells. NS, not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 compared to Vehicle or as indicated; ### P < 0.001 compared to Vehicle, Analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test. The data are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments with similar results ( a and b upper ; d , e , g ). The data are represented as the means ± standard errors from three mice per group ( a and b lower ; c , f , h ).

Article Snippet: To establish M1 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml of IFN-γ (R&D Systems) and 100 ng/ml of lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich) for an additional 48 h. To establish M2 macrophages, the unpolarized macrophages were stimulated with 20 ng/ml IL-4 and 20 ng/ml IL-13 (R&D Systems) for an additional 48 h. Following polarization, cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis or fixed for immunofluorescent staining.

Techniques: Marker, Expressing, Staining, Quantitation Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Isolation, Western Blot

Journal: Chinese medicine

Article Title: Shen-Bai-Jie-Du decoction suppresses the progression of colorectal adenoma to carcinoma through regulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids.

doi: 10.1186/s13020-024-01019-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 9 The schematic diagram of the mechanism of SBJDD. SBJDD may exert its inhibitory effects on colorectal adenoma carcinogenesis by regulating gut microbiota, promoting the production of SCFAs, activating G protein-coupled receptors GPR43, GPR41 and GPR109a, inhibiting histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC3, inducing M2-like macrophage polarization, reducing intestinal inflammation, inhibiting cancer cell proliferation and restoring intestinal barrier function

Article Snippet: Anti-GAPDH (no. 2118S), anti-β-Tubulin (no. 2146S) and Mouse Reactive M1 vs M2 Macrophage IHC Antibody Sampler Kit (no. 97624 T) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, USA).

Techniques:

Journal: NPJ Systems Biology and Applications

Article Title: Large-scale computational modelling of the M1 and M2 synovial macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis

doi: 10.1038/s41540-024-00337-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Single knockouts of the therapeutic targets from the TTD database that perturb the RA macrophages’ phenotypes.

Article Snippet: The RA M1 and M2 macrophage models are available in the BioModels repository under the Identifiers MODEL2307180001 and MODEL2307180002, respectively.

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery

Journal: NPJ Systems Biology and Applications

Article Title: Large-scale computational modelling of the M1 and M2 synovial macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis

doi: 10.1038/s41540-024-00337-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Combinations of therapeutic targets (from the TTD database) that perturb the RA macrophages’ phenotypes.

Article Snippet: The RA M1 and M2 macrophage models are available in the BioModels repository under the Identifiers MODEL2307180001 and MODEL2307180002, respectively.

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery